An Aruba wireless solution for a very high density (VHD) wireless solution consists of a Mobility Master (MM) and two Mobility Controllers (MCs). What is the best practice design for routing the wireless traffic?
An Aruba wireless solution for a very high density (VHD) wireless solution consists of a Mobility Master (MM) and two Mobility Controllers (MCs). What is the best practice design for routing the wireless traffic?
In a very high-density wireless solution using Aruba networks equipment, the Mobility Controllers (MCs) are typically configured to operate at Layer 2, while the core routing switches act as the default gateway. This is because it allows for more efficient routing and handling of traffic with reduced latency and increased reliability. Additionally, having core routing switches as the default gateway allows for better management and scalability in handling the high number of devices and traffic flows typical in high-density environments.
More like C
C is correct
C is correct - "The Controller should not be a default gateway for the WLAN clients as the first hop redundancy is critical" (ACDP Guide)
A en C should work too, but is not Aruba's best practice. So answer C is correct.
Sorry, A and D should work too, but is not Aruba's pest practice, So answer C is correct.
C is correct, check MC as Layer 2 switch or Layer 3 router