Which two client types have the lowest cost of ownership and are easier to manage deployments, perform firmware updates, and monitor? (Choose two.)
Which two client types have the lowest cost of ownership and are easier to manage deployments, perform firmware updates, and monitor? (Choose two.)
Thin Clients and Zero Clients are generally the two client types that have the lowest cost of ownership and are easier to manage when it comes to deployments, firmware updates, and monitoring. Thin Clients are designed to offload most of their computational work to a central server, thereby reducing the complexity and cost of the client device. Zero Clients take this idea even further by having no local storage or configuration, simplifying management even more. Windows Clients and MacOS Clients, while powerful, tend to have higher costs of ownership due to licensing fees and more complex management needs. Headless Clients are niche and typically do not meet the criteria for low cost of ownership and ease of management.
agree with answer