During a VCF design workshop, the architect gathered the following customer requirements:
• There should be two environments: PROD and DEV.
• PROD and DEV workloads should communicate without traversing the physical network.
• The PROD workload domain should be separate from the DEV workload domain.
• The VCF infrastructure design should be flexible and scalable as much as possible.
How many total NSX manager cluster(s) will be deployed as part of the solution?
Only one NSX Manager cluster is needed to meet the customer requirements. Given that the PROD and DEV workload domains need to communicate without traversing the physical network, both can be managed by a single NSX Manager cluster, which simplifies the design and maintains flexibility and scalability. Additionally, a single NSX Manager cluster can manage multiple workload domains, providing the required separation between PROD and DEV while enabling communication between them without leaving the virtual environment.
Based on the fact that says "How many total NSX manager cluster(s) will be deployed as part of the solution? " and assuming that DEV and PROD are VI Workload Domains, I'd go with C, since there must also be a Management Domain which will also have its own NSX Manager cluster that cannot be shared among other domains. Otherwise I'd choose option A since we would be talking just about DEV and PROD VI Workload Domains and due to the fact that a single NSX Manager cluster could be shared among these domains. - YoMeroElLechero
It should option A. bcos prod and dev should communicate without going TOR
They need are separated so answer C