An administrator is tasked with setting up a disaster recovery solution on top of a standard vSAN cluster in the first site and a separate standard vSAN cluster in the secondary site. Costs are a constraint and should be kept to the absolute minimum.
Which solution fits this use case best?
The administrator should opt for VMware vSphere Replication as it is a cost-effective solution for replicating virtual machines to another site. This method uses built-in functionality and doesn’t require additional licenses or hardware as some other options might. It provides an efficient way of ensuring disaster recovery while keeping costs to a minimum.
My answer is C. SRM and vSR is cost efficient
This one is annoying, the question specifically says "Disaster recovery solution". The only answer left then is SRM which is a disaster recovery solution. Sure, you can achieve some of the expected results doing it yourself with policies on a stretch cluster, but SRM is the product intended for disaster recovery. I believe the correct answer is C
And obviously storage replication with SRM will cost licensing from the storage vendor
My answer is B