Exam 3V0-42.20 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 56

An architect is helping an organization with the Logical Design of an NSX-T Data Center solution.

This information was gathered during the Assessment Phase:

✑ Customer is concerned with NSX Manager availability.

✑ 3 cabinets/racks are available in the data center.

No integration with 3 -

✑ party solution is required.

✑ There is no budget for physical equipment acquisition.

✑ The 3 cabinets/racks do not share the same L2 domain.

Which three selections should the architect include in their design to address the customer's concern with NSX Manager availability? (Choose three.)

    Correct Answer: B, E, F

    To address the customer's concern with NSX Manager availability, the architect should deploy an NSX Manager Appliance per rack and cluster them, ensuring that each appliance uses a separate IP per rack. Additionally, a load balancer, either physical or internal, should be used with the cluster to improve availability and manageability. This design ensures that NSX Manager appliances are distributed across the available racks, providing redundancy and high availability across different subnets.

Discussion
RevanTOptions: BEF

Correct Answer: BEF

diegof1Options: BEF

BEF is the correct. With load balancer you can deploy NSX Manager in different subnets and cluster them.

BrianOCOptions: BEF

B, E, F https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-NSX-T-Data-Center/2.4/installation/GUID-72A55651-0031-43A4-9F23-5950C1AFF304.html https://vxplanet.com/2020/03/26/using-nsx-t-loadbalancer-for-the-nsx-t-management-cluster-part-1/ https://vxplanet.com/2020/03/26/using-nsx-t-loadbalancer-for-the-nsx-t-management-cluster-part-2/

PheakdeyOptions: BEF

Correct answer: BEF

tester2478Options: BCE

I think correct is BCE since question states (i think it says no 3 party required) we cannot use internal/physical load balancer (we in any case should use external load balancer) F is wrong.If F is wrong we shoudl use default cluster mode that means BCE. I think using Internal load balncer is not officially supported since in my guide from evantage i have: Costly: Requires external load-balancing solution. So o go for BCE

AT45816Options: BEF

BEF is the correct.

tester2478Options: BEF

Should be BEF since if we eant HA we have to use three rack with three differnet subnet

AlchotOptions: BEF

BEF is correct