A developer is building a complex workflow that uses many decision points. The project will be used by other developers at a later time. Based on best practices, what should the developer use to enhance the readability of the project?
A developer is building a complex workflow that uses many decision points. The project will be used by other developers at a later time. Based on best practices, what should the developer use to enhance the readability of the project?
To enhance the readability of a complex workflow with many decision points, best practices recommend using Flowcharts combined with Flow Decisions. Using Flowcharts allows the workflow's logic to be visualized more clearly, while Flow Decisions make it easy to follow various decision paths. Properly annotating activities and renaming sequences further enhances readability and maintainability, helping other developers understand the workflow more easily. Sequences inside Flowcharts ensure the decision-making process is clear and the overall structure is organized. Thus, the most effective approach is to use Flowcharts with Flow Decisions, and properly annotate and rename the sequences.
The answer is C. The workflow has complex decisions and for that there needs to be a flowchart with flow decisions. In that sequences are needed to annotate on and improve readability, which is also part of the question. Invoke of other workflows can also be used instead of sequences but that is not in any of the answers.
The given answer is correct
There are three different types of processing. Linear Iterative Transactional All three differ on how data is fetched and processing is done. Linear: Data is fetched once and processing is done once. Iterative: Data is fetched in bulk and processing is done iteratively. Transactional: Here data fetching and processing are independent from one another as they are split into different states. In iterative if a single data point results in a failure, whole workflow can fail but in transactional as transactions are independent of one another a single data point never results in breaking down of complete workflow.
The point of the question is to improve readability, not the definition of those states. I might be wrong, but i believe the answer is C. You basically just got the topic from another question.