Exam OG0-093 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 214

Scenario:

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect in a company that develops wind turbines for use in wind farms. The company has three manufacturing facilities, one in North America, one in Asia, and one in Europe. Each of these facilities supplies the power industry in its region.

The company recognizes that the long-term technical potential of wind energy can address the current global dependency on carbon fuels. In order to do so this will require wind turbines to be installed over large areas of higher wind resources. In particular offshore wind farms can contribute substantially more energy than land stationed turbines.

The research arm of the company has pioneered the development of an offshore wind turbine design, with an improved turbine blade and power system, that will produce up to 20% more energy. This will allow the production of significantly more saleable energy. This new design is ready to go into production.

The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice supported by a cross-functional Architecture Board and uses the TOGAF standard. The Chief

Information Officer and the Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.

As part of putting the new design into production, a pilot architecture project has defined an updated standard approach for controlling the automated test systems used to perform final quality assurance to perform final quality assurance. The Architecture Board approved the plan for immediate implementation at each plant.

Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement and deploy the new Automated Test System controller for each location.

The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, has expressed concern that a uniform process be employed at each location to ensure consistency.

Refer to the Scenario -

You have been asked to recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.

Based on the TOGAF standard, Version 9.2, which of the following is the best answer?

    Correct Answer: A

    To address the Chief Engineer's concern about maintaining a uniform process across all locations, it is essential to ensure that each location adheres to the defined Architecture Contract. Reviewing these contracts to confirm they meet the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management requirements ensures consistency. Additionally, scheduling compliance reviews at key points during implementation helps monitor adherence to the Architecture Definition. Any deviations from the contract should be reviewed by the Architecture Board, which can decide whether to grant dispensations, ensuring any customizations still align with the overall architecture goals and do not compromise the uniformity of processes.

Discussion
venksfcOption: A

Correct answer is A; The section in D goes against the requirement: to allow the implementation organization the ability to customize the process to meet their local needs

lepperboy

yes agree - key point here is making sure the process is uniform across each location - this was a key concern.

diazedOption: A

A is the correct Answer. Option B & C are irrelevant due to the arch contract is in place already. D option is a distractor.

PratsMic

ALL THE BS WRONG ANSWERS ON EXAM TOPICS https://www.examtopics.com/discussions/the-open-group/view/31323-exam-og0-092-topic-1-question-17-discussion/

noureldinOption: A

As a consultant to lead architect, you cannot create an Architecture Contract…, you can only review. … At the same time.. Option A says “considers whether or not to grant a dispensation”.. whereas, option C directly says to provide dispensation which is not correct . Final Answer is Option A..

MrCee1Option: A

A is the correct answer

BanzaaaiOption: A

A. You review the applicable Architecture Contract for each location, ensuring that it addresses the project objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management.

youthanasiaOption: A

A is correct. The architecture contract is already developed, so, B & C are out. What does the performance of the turbines have to do with EA, nothing... So D is out.

Dmitry777Option: A

A is the correct answer

RjessayeOption: D

I think the arch contract is already created and we have to just use it for governance

Elisa2021Option: A

Answer A is more appropriate with approach in Phase H

Nicholas_The_King_KongOption: A

I don't think it is possible that "D" is correct. It should be the king of all distractor here! How can the architecture contract be changed without scrutiny when one local implementation asked for it? And it is not the role of the EA to request for a new architecture work, isn't that the sponsor's role?

sreejayanOption: A

looks like A is the correct answer

sreejayanOption: A

A is the correct answer - need Board to approve to grant the change or not

ankit89Option: A

A is correct

sushmapatilOption: B

B seems to be corrects answer considering uniform & consistent process at each plant and dispensation decision.