Exam OG0-092 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 9

Scenario: Zephyr Enterprises -

Zephyr Enterprises specializes in the development of wind turbine blades for use in large-scale commercial wind energy production systems. Zephyr has manufacturing facilities located in Palm Springs, California, Omaha, Nebraska, and Winnipeg, Ontario. Each of these plants supplies a different manufacturer that builds and sells complete systems. The turbine blades are custom engineered to meet each manufacturers design specifications.

Until recently, most turbine blades were fabricated manually using molded fiber-reinforced plastics. However, recent improvements in composite materials, coupled with enhanced automated methods for precision application of materials during the molding process, have led to significant reduction in weight, increase in strength, and greatly improved blade longevity. Zephyr has pioneered the development of a proprietary automated process for continuous extrusion of the turbine blades. Patents have been filed to protect the process, but certain trade secrets must be closely guarded.

Zephyr has a mature Enterprise Architecture organization that is supported by a cross-functional Architecture Review Board. The Chief Information Officer and the

Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.

Zephyr has used TOGAF and its Architecture Development Method (ADM) to develop its automated manufacturing processes and systems that are used to design, manufacture, and test the blade assemblies. They have recently updated to TOGAF 9 and have adapted the Zephyr Enterprise Architecture to closely follow the TOGAF 9 framework. All of Zephyrs IT architects have been trained and certified on TOGAF 9.Recently, an architecture project was completed that defined a standard approach for controlling the Automated Test System that is used at each plant to perform final quality assurance tests on each completed blade assembly. The Manufacturing Architecture Board approved the plan for immediate implementation at each plant.

An Architecture Contract was developed that detailed the work needed to implement and deploy the new Automated Test System controller. The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, has expressed concern that a uniform process be employed at each site to ensure consistency.

You have been assigned by the Lead Architect for the Automated Test System controller project to conduct Compliance Assessments at each manufacturing plant.

During the course of the assessment at the Omaha plant, you discover that the Distributed Data Acquisition System they have purchased uses a proprietary

Remote Procedure Call (RPC) that utilizes kernel mode threads instead of the user mode threads that are specified in the Architecture Definition Document. In all other respects, the system meets the requirements stated in the Architecture Definition Document and seems to perform correctly.

You have been asked to describe the compliance of this system for the final report.

Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?

    Correct Answer: D

    The system cannot be described as conformant because one of its features, the RPC mechanism, has not been implemented according to the specification in the Architecture Definition Document. Even though the system meets most of the requirements and appears to work correctly, any feature implemented not in accordance with the specification renders the system non-conformant. The process requires strict adherence to the specified user mode threads rather than kernel mode threads. Therefore, the correct description for the system's compliance is non-conformant.

Discussion
PrasadvdOption: D

Ans is D, since the Arch defintion document specified the use of user threads and the architecture did not conform to the definition

zetiOption: A

Sholdn't it be A? Everything is compliant, except kernel mode threads instead of user mode threads. Thus, conformant.

tushmish

definition of Non-conformant https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap42.html#tag_42_02

mrg998Option: D

Answer is D.

cerifyme85Option: A

conformant ==> Some more features (Extra features) Non-Conformant ==> like for like but not within specification (no extras) RPC Kernel .. instead of ... RPC user mode ( Kernel not within specification, but both are RPCs)

RACHIT0412Option: D

ChatGPT says D

AmalDev007Option: D

Non-conformant: Any of the features in the architecture specification is implemented not in accordance with the specification. -- Here the RPC was implemented in a different way from the specification document Conformant: All the features in the architecture specification are implemented in accordance with the specification, but some *more* features are implemented that are not in the specification document

93madoxOption: A

Conformant: All the features in the architecture specification are implemented in accordance with the specification - question says: in all other aspects, system meets the requirements stated in Architecture Definition Document and seems perform correctly. , but some more features are implemented that are not in accordance with it - in question that one is related to RPC case. Non-conformant: Any of the above in which some features in the architecture specification are implemented not in accordance with the specification. - That would be if not all features are implemented - and some of those implemented aren ot according to standard. THat is not a case here.

aa00601093Option: A

Answer should be A, as per the definition of Conformant. Follow below link - https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap42.html#tag_42_02

Falconion

It can't be conformant. The definition of conformat is: "All the features in the architecture are implemented in accordance with the specification, but some more features are implemented that are not in accordance with it." Because the Kernel was not implemented, not "all features of the architecture are implemented in accordance with the spec". I still struggle between consistent and non-conformant, yet I don't really get the difference between the two.

clementiOption: D

The answer seems the D because in the document is specified the use of user threads instead in the implementation is used the kernel mode thread. So the RPC is implemented not in accordance with the specification.

rkustagiOption: A

The solution is Conformant as RPC is the only deviation that may go through dispensation

SVGNROption: D

https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/chap24.html#tagfcjh_30 Based on the above specification -The correct answer is " Non Conformant"

OutofthecaveOption: D

The answer is D - Non Conformant

MackDOption: D

Answer D Non-Conformant: Any of the above in which some features in the architecture specs are implemented not in accordance with the specification Meaning: any of the above in the Togaf documentation which could be possible that ALL features are implemented and that some features that are implemented are not according to the Architecture Definition Document. Specifically this "some features in the architecture specs are implemented not in accordance with the specification". This is specified "Remote Procedure Call (RPC) that utilizes kernel mode threads instead of the user mode threads that are specified in the Architecture Definition Document." Meaning that it already was a feature stated in the Architecture Definition Document and is NOT an additional feature.

elainexsOption: D

Check document, it's D

bitsmax

Architecture Compliance , Chap 24