Which of the following best describes the TOGAF classification in Phase H for a re-architecting change?
Which of the following best describes the TOGAF classification in Phase H for a re-architecting change?
A re-architecting change, as described in TOGAF Phase H, involves revisiting and possibly overhauling the entire architecture. This type of change is generally driven by the need to increase investment to create new value for exploitation. By re-architecting, organizations aim to enhance their architecture to support new strategic initiatives and realize new opportunities, making B the most accurate description.
should be re-align with Strategy
Yes, E - re-align with Strategy
15.5 Approach 15.5.2 Enterprise Architecture Change Management Process • Re-architecting change: a re-architecting change requires putting the whole architecture through the architecture development cycle again Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap15.html
B is correct Ref : a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf92-doc/arch/
E is the correct answer. Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change, by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a re-architecting change, by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation
E is wrong.
B is correct. Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap15.html
Answer B is correct. Part of phase H, change management process. "Re-architecting change:are-architecting change requires putting the whole architecture through the architecture development cycle again"
B is correct. A re-architecting change : by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/chap14.html
15.5.2 " simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a rearchitecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf91-doc/arch/chap16.html Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation.
Correct Asnwer Re-architecting change: a re-architecting change requires putting the whole architecture through the architecture development cycle again
B. A change driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation
Correct Answer : B
Selected Answer - B 15.5.2 Enterprise Architecture Change Management Process The approach is based on classifying required architectural changes into one of three categories: Simplification change: a simplification change can normally be handled via change management techniques Incremental change: an incremental change may be capable of being handled via change management techniques, or it may require partial re-architecting, depending on the nature of the change (see 15.5.3 Guidelines for Maintenance versus Architecture Redesign for guidelines) Re-architecting change: a re-architecting change requires putting the whole architecture through the architecture development cycle again Another way of looking at these three choices is to say that a simplification change to an architecture is often driven by a requirement to reduce investment; an incremental change is driven by a requirement to derive additional value from existing investment; and a re-architecting change is driven by a requirement to increase investment in order to create new value for exploitation.