OG0-093 Exam QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam

OG0-093 Exam - Question 206


Scenario:

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

The ABC company is a large, global commodities trading company which has been growing rapidly through a series of acquisitions.

Each new business is performing well in its markets. However, the lack of integration between headquarters and the business units has increasingly caused problems in the handling of customer and financial information. The inability to share information across businesses has resulted in lost opportunities to "leverage the synergies" that had been intended when the businesses were acquired. At present, each business unit maintains its own applications. Despite an earlier initiative to install a common application to manage customer, products, supplier, and inventory information, each business unit has different ways of defining each of these core elements and has customized the common application to the point where the ability to exchange information is difficult, costly, and error-prone.

As a result, the company has begun implementing a single Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system to consolidate information from several applications that exist across the lines of business.

The Corporate Board is concerned that the new ERP system must be able to manage and safeguard customer information in a manner that meets or exceeds the legal requirements of the countries in which the company operates. This will be an increasingly important capability as the company expands its online services offered to clients and trading partners.

The CIO has formed an Enterprise Architecture department, and one of the primary goals in its charter is to coordinate efforts between the ERP implementation team and the business unit personnel who will be involved in the migration process. The CIO has also formed a cross-functional Architecture Review Board to oversee and govern the architecture. The company has selected TOGAF 9 as the basis for its Enterprise Architecture program. The CIO has endorsed this choice with the full support of top management.

Refer to the Scenario -

You are serving as the Chief Architect.

You have been asked to recommend the approach to take in the Preliminary Phase to ensure that the Corporate Board's concern is addressed.

Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?

Show Answer
Correct Answer: B

To address the Corporate Board's concern in the Preliminary Phase, it is essential to first understand the intent behind the concern and its implications on regulatory requirements and business goals. This understanding will inform the development of a comprehensive security architecture that aligns with these concerns. Proposing the allocation of a security architect or a team to develop this architecture ensures that security considerations are systematically included in the architecture planning, addressing the Board’s worries effectively.

Discussion

13 comments
Sign in to comment
SomeshSuleOption: B
Jul 31, 2021

Directly updating some corporate security policy at the Preliminary Phase doesn't seem correct (A and D). Between B and C it's difficult to think but it seems Proposing something seems like the Architect's job :) Then the Sponsor would issue Request for Architecture Work. B seems correct to me.

SomeshSuleOption: B
Aug 8, 2021

Request for Architecture Work is not raised by Ent. Arch. - therefore seems C incorrect. Security architecture is supposed to be separate knowledge area which is very broad and comprehensive. Therefore, Ent. Arch would just propose and let specialist team come in.

KASPointOption: C
May 15, 2021

C Looks more appropriate as 'Request for Architecture Work' is the outcome of Preliminary Phase. Also, in other blogs mostly answered is 'A'. please share your inputs

manderda
Jun 10, 2021

In my understanding it should be B. You are a chef architect and therefore you can't just change a security policy on your understanding. And the Request for Architecture Work is issued by the sponsor?

sameersoftyhclOption: B
Jun 28, 2021

I think B is the right asnwer because the questions asks for "Recommendations", but other answers are simply taking some actions which are not even in scope of Chief Architect.

KMurthy04Option: D
Jul 25, 2021

IT is D because the phase is preliminary phase where we first make sure the business goals and objectives are first aligned with this need, so that is why the impact of this change on the existing business goals and objectives are considered.

noureldinOption: B
Nov 23, 2022

Answer:B

DiptendraOption: C
Jun 10, 2021

Why not C

Learner64
Jan 4, 2023

Request for Architecture Work issued by sponsor, not an architect.

bitsmaxOption: B
Aug 19, 2021

B seems most appropriate answer. None of other option satisfy the criterias

ankit89Option: A
Oct 27, 2021

A is the best answer

shreeraj23Option: A
Feb 5, 2023

It should be A. https://www.briefmenow.org/the-open-group/which-of-the-following-is-the-best-answer-2/

Iyo
Sep 6, 2023

The answer in the page you shared the url corresponds to option C here. And I can tell that option is the most certainly wrong answer due to the "Request for Architecture Work" statement in the answer.

KrishnaKMOption: B
Mar 25, 2023

B seems correct

SayanzOption: B
Aug 8, 2023

B seems appropriate as it emphasize on Preliminary phase to Develop a Security Architecture

aa15101Option: B
Feb 4, 2024

B EA cannot update security policies EA cannot issues Request of architecture work