Exam OG0-092 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 17

Scenario:

You are the Lead Enterprise Architect in a company that specializes in the development of wind turbine blades for use in large-scale commercial wind energy production systems. The company has manufacturing facilities located in Illinois, Nebraska, and Manitoba. Each of these plants supplies a different manufacturer that builds and sells complete systems. The turbine blades are custom engineered to meet each manufacturer's design specifications.

Until recently, most turbine blades were fabricated manually using molded fiber-reinforced plastics. However, recent improvements in composite materials, coupled with enhanced automated methods for precision application of materials during the molding process, have led to significant reduction in weight, increase in strength, and improved blade longevity. The company has pioneered the development of a proprietary automated process for continuous extrusion of the turbine blades. Patents have been filed to protect the process, but certain trade secrets must be closely guarded.

The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture organization that is supported by a cross-functional Architecture Board. The Chief Information Officer and the

Chief Operating Officer co-sponsor the Enterprise Architecture program.

TOGAF 9 and its Architecture Development Method (ADM) are used to develop the automated manufacturing processes and systems that are used to design, manufacture, and test the blade assemblies.

Recently, a pilot architecture project was completed at a single location that defined a standard approach for controlling the Automated Test System that is used at each plant to perform final quality assurance tests on each completed blade assembly. The Architecture Board approved the plan for immediate implementation at each plant.

Architecture Contracts have been developed that detail the work needed to implement and deploy the new Automated Test System controller for each location.

The Chief Engineer, sponsor of the activity, has expressed concern that a uniform process be employed at each location to ensure consistency.

You have been asked to recommend the best approach to address the Chief Engineer's concern.

Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?

    Correct Answer: A

    To ensure that the Chief Engineer's concern about consistency is addressed, it is essential to review the existing Architecture Contracts for each location to verify they meet the project's objectives, effectiveness metrics, acceptance criteria, and risk management requirements. Scheduling compliance reviews at key points in the implementation process will help ensure the work aligns with the Architecture Definition. The Architecture Board should have the authority to review and approve or deny any requests for deviations, which allows for the necessary governance and adaptability while maintaining uniformity across each plant.

Discussion
Krishna4uOption: A

Hi Victor, A seems correct, in the question, it was already mentioned that there are different contracts for each locations.

pankaj3284Option: A

Answer is A as there is no term like Memorandom of Understanding in TOGAF ,so must be A

rumnetOption: A

Answer is A. there is another version of this scenario where the contracts have not yet been developed. In that other case, the answer is the same but begins with "you create a contract" . in this case, the contracts are already done, so its exactly the same ending, just starting with "you REVIEW the contracts". :)

tushmish

Good catch. The only thing I am not sure of is - Architecture Contract for 'each location'.

PratsMicOption: A

A - Right B - Wrong - Arch Contracts exists why create? C - Wrong - Arch Contracts exists why create? D - Wrong - if deviation is detected without discussion you are modifying contract

Sumit2107Option: A

B and C are incorrect as they are mentioning "You create Architecture Contracts" while the contracts are already created. Also, D mentions submitting a new Request of Work, which is not needed here, as this can be done by using the Iteration Cycle ADM technique. So A looks to be correct.

Divya07Option: B

B is correct. EA does not schedule Reviews.

sameersoftyhcl

Architecture Contracts are already developed, so EA does not have to create it again. I think A is correct.

Victor6510Option: B

Sponsor's concern is to have a uniform process, while answer A is assuming different contracts which doesn't address stakeholder's concern.

HN6366Option: A

IS the lead architect responsible for legal stuff? "you ensure that it is a legally enforceable contract"

WatadOption: A

Answer is A

lorik75Option: A

A: Best one: Internal governance - there is lesser problem with losing the secrets B: is OK, but external - Problem with the "certain trade secrets must be closely guarded" C : if a deviation from the Architecture Contract is detected,the Architecture Board grant a dispensation to allow (doesn't matter what, it will be granted) D : We don't need need Architecture definition. Dispansation is enough

aurzauOption: A

Answer is A. I got 100% and this was one of my questions.

rkustagiOption: A

Choice A is best as the Architecture contract is developed already B & C are not correct. D is distractor

SVGNROption: A

Architecture Contract covers internal Organizations also and TOGAF specification does not mention MoU anywhere . See https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap43.html Read the following part "At the beginning of Phase G (Implementation Governance), between the architecture function and the function responsible for implementing the Enterprise Architecture defined in the preceding ADM phases; typically, this will be either the in-house systems development function, or a major contractor to whom the work is outsourced" So the correct answer is A and not B as some may think