Exam OG0-093 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 228

Scenario -

Please read this scenario prior to answering the Question

You are working as a consultant to the Chief Architect at a government agency responsible for securing all government communications and information systems.

The agency has recently received funding for a program that will upgrade the reliability and performance of its secure communication systems which provide real- time, highly secure communication of voice, video, and message data to remote locations around the world.

The agency has an established enterprise architecture (EA) capability based on TOGAF 9. The Executive Director of the agency is the sponsor of the EA capability.

Since reliable, high-performance, and secure communications are essential to preserving national security, the Executive Director has placed more stringent requirements for the architecture for the upgraded system. It must be able to provide assurance and verification of specific performance measures on the key services that are most crucial for system operation. Focusing on these service-level details and specific measurements will allow more stringent requirements to be enforced in service contracts. It will also provide a high degree of assurance that necessary performance is being delivered and that notifications will occur if any critical service fails to perform as required.

A portion of the program budget has been allocated to context a review of the EA. The scope of the review is to evaluate the processes, content and governance of the EA capability to ensure that the higher target performance and service levels required by the upgraded system can be achieved.

The Chief Architecture has noted that the core EA artifacts that have been used since TOGAF 9 was introduced are not adequate to describe these new capabilities. The artifacts do not have explicit provisions for defining the in-depth measurement requirements regarding specific services required for the system.

She has learned that certain services within the current system have service measurement implementations that match some of the new requirements, but they are only used in a few areas.

Recent EA efforts at another national agency have produced generalized high-performance communication system models to realize similar requirements in a critical defense system involving secure communications. It is possible that these models may be useful for the upgrade program.

Refer to the Scenario -

You have been asked to make recommendations for tailoring the Architecture Content Metamodel to accommodate the requirements of the upgraded system.

Based on TOGAF, which of the following is the best answer?

    Correct Answer: A

    In this scenario, integrating specific measurements and additional data for supporting performance objectives requires modeling goals, objectives, and service levels. The motivation and governance extensions of the TOGAF 9 Content Metamodel should be used for this purpose. Employing these extensions allows linking goals and objectives to service levels and developing detailed governance models, which ensures that stringent performance requirements are met and are aligned with the agency's objectives. This approach also facilitates the re-use and customization of existing profiles for various service contracts, addressing both the governance and service-level needs crucial for the upgraded system.

Discussion
RVROption: C

I think C is the correct answer. The scenario is: a) "defining the in-depth measurement requirements regarding specific services required for the system" b) "certain services within the current system have service measurement implementations that match some of the new requirements, but they are only used in a few areas." 34.4.2 Services Extensions defines exact solution to the requirement : "When the business has a preset definition of its services that does not align well to technical and architectural needs" "Where IT service is misaligned with business need, particular ly around the areas of quality of service, visibility of perfor mance, and management granularity" You don't need the whole suite of extensions as the case says only a portion of the program budget has been allocated and that os to context a review of the EA.

sve306

the question is about the service-levels; not the service itself. Motivation extensions to be used - "When service levels are unknown or unclear" . Governance extensions to used - "When an organization has granular requirements for service levels that differ from service to service" . Scope of governance extension - The ability to define re-usable service qualities defining a service-level profile that can be used in contracts

harofe2121

"She has learned that certain services within the current system have service measurement implementations that match some of the new requirements, but they are only used in a few areas." From this I think we can infer that this could be reused and does not need any action in terms of evolving it, but can be used as it is.

PrashanttheCloudMaster

best solution --> A C B D

Saad777Option: C

Why not A, this covers re-use of existing profiles.

noureldinOption: C

“certain services within the current system have service measurement implementations that match some of the new requirements” this is 34.4.2 Services Extensions of Content Metamodel Extensions –>C

roganjoshOption: A

Should be A, please see the below discussion : - https://www.examtopics.com/discussions/the-open-group/view/60957-exam-og0-092-topic-1-question-58-discussion/

SayanzOption: C

C is the answer. Confirmed through Exam.

BanzaaaiOption: A

the motivation and governance extensions of the TOGAF 9 Content Metamodel are used

sve306Option: A

he question is about the service-levels; not the service itself. Motivation extensions to be used - "When service levels are unknown or unclear" . Governance extensions to used - "When an organization has granular requirements for service levels that differ from service to service" . Scope of governance extension - The ability to define re-usable service qualities defining a service-level profile that can be used in contracts

harofe2121

Below is from the scenario "The artifacts do not have explicit provisions for defining the in-depth measurement requirements regarding specific services required for the system." This part would require service extension to be used.

ankit89Option: C

C is correct

SomeshSuleOption: A

Services extension does not include modeling and data. Modeling and Data are separate extensions. Hence C seems incorrect.

sushmapatilOption: A

A seems correct . considering below statement. " The scope of the review is to evaluate the processes, content and governance of the EA capability to ensure that the higher target performance and service levels required by the upgraded system can be achieved. "