Exam OG0-093 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 208

Scenario:

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

The ABC company is a major supplier in the automotive industry, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio with manufacturing plants in Chicago, Sao Paulo, Stuttgart,

Yokohama, and Seoul. Each of these plants has been operating its own planning and production scheduling systems, as well as custom developed applications that drive the automated production equipment at each plant.

The company is implementing lean manufacturing principles to minimize waste and improve the efficiency of all of its production operations. During a recent exercise held for internal quality improvement, it was determined that a significant reduction in process waste could be achieved by replacing the current planning and scheduling systems with a common Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system located in the Cleveland data center. This central system would provide support to each of the plants replacing the functionality in the existing systems. It would also eliminate the need for full data centers at each of the plant facilities. A reduced number of IT staff could support the remaining applications. In some cases, a third-party contractor could provide those staff.

The company Enterprise Architecture department has been operating for several years and has mature, well-developed architecture governance and development processes that are strongly based on TOGAF 9. At a recent meeting, the Architecture Review Board approved a Request for Architecture Work from the Chief

Engineer of Global Manufacturing Operations who is the project sponsor. The request covered the initial architectural investigations and the development of a comprehensive architecture to plan the transformation.

The Common ERP Deployment architecture project team has now been formed, and the project team has been asked to develop an Architecture Vision that will achieve the desired outcomes and benefits. Some of the plant managers have expressed concern about the security and reliability of driving their planning and production scheduling from a central system located in Cleveland. The Chief Engineer wants to know how these concerns can be addressed.

Refer to the Scenario -

You are serving as the Lead Enterprise Architect of the newly-formed Common ERP Deployment architecture project team.

As the Common ERP Deployment architecture project team assembles for its initial meeting, many of the participants have voiced concerns about the sweeping scope of the initiative. Others are confident that they know a solution that will work. During the meeting, a number of alternative recommendations for how to proceed are put forward by members of the team.

You have been asked to select the most appropriate recommendation to ensure that the team evaluates different approaches to the problem and clarifies the requirements for the architecture.

Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?

    Correct Answer: A

    The team should hold a series of interviews at each of the manufacturing plants using the business scenario technique. This will then enable them to identify and document the characteristics of the architecture from the business requirements. This approach aligns best with TOGAF 9 principles for understanding stakeholder concerns and deriving business requirements. It ensures that the concerns of the plant managers regarding security and reliability are addressed in a comprehensive manner by gathering input directly from those affected.

Discussion
tomvikOption: A

should be A

praveenrajaOption: A

business scenario technique should be used

yogeshmalikEQOption: A

Yes, should be A

OCHTOption: A

The business scenario technique (option A) is a method for deriving business requirements that address business concerns and issues. It involves understanding and documenting the business context, events triggering the scenario, and the desired outcomes. This approach would help to identify and address the concerns of the stakeholders (including plant managers), and to clarify the requirements for the new system. The other options (B, C, and D) involve steps that might be useful later in the architecture development process, but they don't directly address the need to understand and address the concerns of the plant managers at this early stage.

caerzzOption: A

A. Phase A covers Identify Stakeholders, Concerns, and Business Requirements

caerzzOption: A

answer is A

suman9524Option: A

Ask is to understand the requirement and address stakeholder concerns. A talks about using business scenario technique to understand their concerns and then only it can be resolved.

noureldinOption: A

Answer:A

DanieBOption: A

Should be A

BanzaaaiOption: A

business scenarios

Kishore1991Option: A

Answer should be A

ankit89Option: A

A is the answer

Camus_Option: A

Answer should be A, using business scenario to understand the requirements

thirstylionOption: A

Answer: A

KASPointOption: A

Option A looks more closer, than C

youthanasiaOption: A

Answer is A, in order to satisfy all the plant managers concerns, you would have to go to each of the manufacturing plants and run the business scenarios. It's the most long winded approach, but satisfies all the requirements of the scenario.