A customer has written the following search:
How can the search be rewritten to maximize efficiency?
A.
B.
C.
D.
A customer has written the following search:
How can the search be rewritten to maximize efficiency?
A.
B.
C.
D.
To maximize search efficiency in Splunk, it is crucial to filter the data as early as possible to reduce the amount of data being processed in subsequent commands. From the provided options, answer C is the correct choice. The command sequence in option C starts by filtering the data using the index, sourcetype, and customer before performing the lookup and stats operations. This ensures that only relevant data is processed, significantly enhancing efficiency. Additionally, option C arranges the commands in an optimized order by prioritizing the customer filter, applying the lookup, filtering by vip_status, aggregating data with stats, and finally displaying the required fields using the table command.
C is right, the filter always first,
must be C while it will NOT result in the same table (missing vip_status field). it must be "customer=" in the main search to limit and D won't work as vip_status is not in the stats command
C is correct.
Correct answer is "D"
Nop, it's C. The stats command is not defining the vip_customer field. In that case you will not see results because the search command is looking for a inexistent field.
Wrong forgot to put the index of sales in the question
u know about default searched indexes if no index is specified?