At the fifth Sprint Retrospective, the Product Owner mentions that he is surprised about the amount of technical debt that has built up in the system and that the product is not able to support an adequate number of users. Peter, the Product Owner, is upset that the product will need several more Sprints to address the scalability issues in order to meet his expectations.
What factors may have led to this?
The factors that may have led to the issues mentioned by the Product Owner could be numerous. These include the Scrum Team not effectively using past Sprint Retrospectives to inspect and adapt, the Development Team not paying enough attention to technical quality, the lack of conversations between the Development Team and the Product Owner regarding technical debt, and the Scrum Master failing to ensure transparency within the Scrum Team. Each of these factors can contribute to the accumulation of technical debt and scalability issues. Therefore, all of the above factors are likely contributors to the problem.
Agree with E
Questionable answers ... A) Inspection and Adaptation (with Stakeholders) are typical properties of the Sprint Review; B) The attention of the Development Team must be focused on the Sprint Goal in compliance with the Definition of Done; C) It can be; D) It can be. Even if a double answer is not contemplated, I would opt for C and D.
For answer A, we use Sprint Review to inspect no ?
Answer is E