Universal Containers uses a private sharing model for opportunities. This model cannot be changed due to a regional structure. A new sales operations team has been created. This team needs to perform analysis on Opportunity data, and should have read and write access to all Opportunities.
Which two are recommended solutions for the app builder to give the users appropriate access? (Choose two.)
Since Universal Containers uses a private sharing model for opportunities and this model cannot be changed, creating a criteria-based sharing rule to share all opportunities with the sales operations public group ensures that the team gets the necessary access in a structured and compliant manner. Additionally, adding a permission set with 'View All' and 'Modify All' opportunity permissions enables the team to read and write to all opportunities, satisfying the requirement for full access required for analysis.
Answer should be C and D
C and D
Def - C and D Correct no Private Group in Sharing model.
C and D. there is no private group to share records.
Connect ans is C&D. Bcoz, 1. There is nothing like Private group. 2. C - though there is no criteria given we can go with this as option is more logical. 3. We can create Pub grp of user and provide requited access of data through permission set.
CD If C is meaning to say "owner-based sharing rule" or the question was meant to only allow one answer, then it makes sense. Otherwise, C and D are the only good option.
C and D. There are no “private groups” of users.
C and D is correct, there is no Private groups
C and D
Question clearly states "all opportunities" access. What criterion could be put for this? Instead A and D should be the answer. B is definitely not because there is nothing like a private group.