Exam PRINCE2-Practitioner All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 31

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage

3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.

Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

    Correct Answer: C

    No, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list. During the preparation phase of a quality review, any potential issues or errors should be recorded on a question list to be addressed in the review meeting, rather than updating the quality register, which is done after the review activities are completed.

Discussion
CilubaOption: C

C should be correct Page 91, Section 8.4.4 Unless some background information are missing. Who said the review activities are completed?

Chivasa

The answer C clearly states that quality review activities are completed though.

Chivasa

I was confusing B with C, my mistake

ManikRoyOption: C

Refer to 8.4.4 Preparing For review Submit a question list to the chair and presenter ahead of the review (reviewers).

ManikRoy

Correcting my previous answer. Correct answer is option D - senior supplier can not be made reviewer as the supplier is responsible for developing the product and thus the quality review won't work.

PieroBeOption: D

The Senior Supplier is the (ultimate) responsible for products to be developed in the project, so he cannot act as a reviewer of these products because it generates a conflict of interests.

ravi_awsOption: B

Therefore, the answer is B. Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed. The quality reviewers are responsible for updating the quality register as quality review activities are completed

ManikRoy

The question mentions 'While preparing for the quality review'

MortenCOption: B

The question is about activity not role.....ie B

Trikuta_KairaOption: D

No, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.