PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 Exam - Question 31

Question

At the end of stage 2, an external consultant responsible for developing the 'e-learning course', was appointed to the project board as a senior supplier. The stage

3 plan identifies the consultant as a reviewer of the 'e-learning course'. When preparing for a quality review of the 'e-learning course', the consultant found 15 possible errors. The consultant then documented these possible errors in the quality register.

Is this an appropriate activity when preparing for a quality review, and why?

Examice · Accepted Answer

No, because possible errors that are found when preparing for a quality review should be documented on a question list. During the preparation phase of a quality review, any potential issues or errors should be recorded on a question list to be addressed in the review meeting, rather than updating the quality register, which is done after the review activities are completed.

Ciluba · Answer

C should be correct 
Page 91, Section 8.4.4
Unless some background information are missing. Who said the review activities are completed?

PieroBe · Answer

The Senior Supplier is the (ultimate) responsible for products to be developed in the project, so he cannot act as a reviewer of these products because it generates a conflict of interests.

ManikRoy · Answer

Refer to 8.4.4 Preparing For review 
Submit a question list to the chair and presenter ahead of the review (reviewers).

Trikuta_Kaira · Answer

No, because the senior supplier should not be identified as a reviewer as part of the quality review technique.

MortenC · Answer

The question is about activity not role.....ie B

ravi_aws · Answer

Therefore, the answer is B. Yes, because the quality reviewers should update the quality register as quality review activities are completed. The quality reviewers are responsible for updating the quality register as quality review activities are completed

PRINCE2-Practitioner Edition 6 Exam - Question 31

Discussion