A change authority has been appointed for the project. During the development of the 'classroom-based training material', a large number of changes were proposed to the design of the 'e-learning course'. Therefore, the change authority has decided to use the Moscow technique to prioritize changes based on the impact they will have on completing each stage on time.
Is this an appropriate application of the Moscow technique, and why?
The MoSCoW technique is a prioritization method used to categorize changes or requirements based on their importance to the project's objectives and business justification. In the context of PRINCE2, it is emphasized that prioritization should align with the project's business justification, ensuring that the changes support the overall purpose and value of the project. Therefore, using the MoSCoW technique to prioritize changes based on the project's business justification is the correct approach.
D is correct Answer
9.4.1 The MoSCoW prioritization technique: When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2’s continued business justification principle.
D. No, because it should be used to prioritize change based on the project's business justification
prioritize requirements according to business justification
Refer 9.4.1 MoSCoW can be used for other types of prioritization, such as prioritizing changes, by adapting the criteria as necessary. When MoSCoW is used in this way, the criteria for must have, should have and could have should always be based on the impact on business justification, in line with PRINCE2's continued business. justification principle
Definitely its a 'yes' answer (There are many ways to prioritize a change request and PRINCE2 introduces the MoSCoW technique - p2wiki), and relates to the entire quality, not just the time. Therefore, answer is B.
I think it is C. MoSCoW technique is a way of prioritizing product requirements so basically setting tolerances on the project scope (what the project has to deliver) supporting managing by exception (in this case scope exceptions).
yes correct answer is d
correct is d