MANAGING PRODUCT DELIVERY -
Stage 2 is in progress. While producing the team plan, the team manager responsible for the work package to develop the 'classroom-based training material' discovered that the representatives assigned to check the products were unsuitable.
Which action should the team manager take in response?
When the team manager discovers that the representatives assigned to check the products are unsuitable, the appropriate action is to discuss the situation with project assurance. Project assurance will provide guidance on how to address the issue, such as by suggesting suitable replacements or additional reviewers, and will ensure that the quality register is updated accordingly if needed. Consulting project assurance ensures that the team's work aligns with the project's quality standards and prevents the issue from escalating.
Another ref is Table 11.2 "Project Assurance"
Option A is correct - Discuss the situation with project assurance. Refer 18.4.1 in the manual. Consult with project assurance as to whether any extra reviewers are required and ensure that the quality register is updated accordingly.
Updating the quality register with these concerns [C] is not the appropriate action in this situation, as the quality register is used to record the quality criteria and standards that will be used to judge the quality of the project's products. Discussing the situation with project assurance [A] is not necessary at this stage, as the issue can be resolved by advising the project manager of the risk. Raising an exception report to the project manager [D] is not appropriate in this situation, as the issue is not out of tolerance and does not require the project manager to make a decision on how to proceed.
B is correct
Sorry my below comment is incorrect, see table 8.1 "Project Assurance" (not 11.2)
B is wrong - this is not a risk, it is an issue. A is correct - Ref C.6.1
it should be A