The change control approach defines how products should be controlled and protected during the project. The accreditation of the 'classroom-based training materials' was planned to take place during stage 2. At the end of the stage, the configuration item record shows that the 'classroom-based training materials' have been accredited. However, the project manager decides to request an audit of the product as well.
Is this appropriate, and why?
It is appropriate for the project manager to request an audit of the product because the project should verify that the recorded status reflects the actual status of the products. This ensures that there are no discrepancies between what is recorded and the actual state of the products, maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the configuration item records.
Ref 11.3.3
11.3.3 It is good practice to periodically verify that the actual status of products reflects the authorized state of products as they are registered in the configuration item records, looking for any discrepancies. This is usually through reviews or audits, typically undertaken at the end of each stage and at the end of the project.
In this case, it is appropriate for the project manager to request an audit of the product as well because the project manager should verify that the recorded status reflects the actual status of the products 1 . Therefore, the correct answer to the question is A: Yes, because the project should verify that the recorded status reflects the actual status of the products.
B seems incorrect, can anyone confirm?
Aaah ok CI's are part of Change Control, so in the approach.
I think it's A. Can someone conform?