The project sponsor of a major initiative is consistently changing the prioritization of modular work packages. The team is used to three week sprints and is becoming increasingly frustrated with the daily changes in scope.
What should the project manager do?
The project manager should set up a meeting with the sponsor to explain the importance of keeping a strict sprint cycle. Frequent changes in prioritization by the sponsor can disrupt the team's workflow and increase frustration. A meeting will allow the project manager to communicate the negative impacts of constant scope changes, emphasize the importance of a stable sprint cycle, and work towards a compromise that aligns the sponsor's needs with the team's productivity. This approach helps in maintaining project momentum and predictability.
A. Set up a meeting with the sponsor to explain the importance of keeping a strict sprint cycle. The project manager should communicate with the sponsor and discuss the impact of the frequent changes in prioritization on the team's work and schedule. They should explain the importance of a strict sprint cycle for maintaining momentum, predictability, and accountability for the project, and find ways to align the sponsor's priorities with the team's work. This can help to mitigate the frustration of the team and ensure the project is on track.
Option C is the best course of action in this situation. The project manager should set up a meeting with the project team and ask for their opinion on what to do. This will provide an opportunity for the team to voice their concerns and suggest potential solutions. It's important for the project manager to consider the team's input and work collaboratively to find a solution that works for everyone.
Scheduling a meeting with the team to brainstorm a solution. So Option C looks the right answer t me.
In this situation, the project manager should consider moving to a Kanban strategy so that work can be reallocated more easily. Kanban is a lean project management approach that emphasizes visualizing work, limiting work in progress, and managing flow. With Kanban, the team can focus on completing work items as they become available, rather than being tied to a specific sprint cycle. This can help to reduce frustration and increase flexibility in responding to changing priorities.
Kanban helps to visualize the flow of work and not changes in scope. Since servant leadership is required here so I agree that C should be the correct answer.
A. Set up a meeting with the sponsor to explain the importance of keeping a strict sprint cycle
A. Set up a meeting with the sponsor to explain the importance of keeping a strict sprint cycle
The project manager should **set up a meeting with the sponsor to explain the importance of keeping a strict sprint cycle** (Option A). Frequent changes in scope can disrupt the team's workflow and negatively impact their productivity. It's crucial for the project manager to communicate this to the sponsor and discuss the potential implications of constant reprioritization. The project manager should also propose a process for handling scope changes that doesn't disrupt the team's sprint cycle. This could involve setting specific times for reviewing and implementing scope changes, such as at the beginning of each sprint or during sprint planning meetings. This approach respects the sponsor's role in guiding the project while also maintaining the team's ability to work effectively.
A couldn`t be a slolution in this case!