A project lead is managing a construction project in an isolated location. There have been delays due to difficult working conditions, which include team sickness and absences.
How should the project lead manage those issues to get the project back on track?
The primary action should be to identify the causes of the issues in order to find a suitable solution. This approach ensures that the project lead understands the root causes of the delays, such as team sickness and absences, and can develop targeted strategies to address these specific challenges. Simply asking for additional budget, reviewing the project scope, or replacing team members may not directly address the underlying issues causing the delays. Understanding the causes allows for more effective and sustainable solutions to get the project back on track.
Option B suggests a proactive approach, where the project lead should analyze the difficulties, such as team sickness and absences, to understand their origins. By identifying the causes, the project lead can then work on developing suitable solutions to mitigate the challenges and get the project back on track. Options A and C propose addressing the issue by asking for additional budget or reviewing the project scope. While these actions might be necessary in certain situations, they don't directly address the underlying causes of the delays.
The issues presented in the question could be 2nd and 3rd order effects. Its important to first understand the root causes of those issues to try and alleviate them and reduce their risk prior to making change decisions.
Seeing a lot of randomly voted answers and people providing zero or just weird explanations. Please do your own studying and don't solely rely on others. B. Identify the causes of the issues in order to find a suitable solution. Explanation: Identifying the root causes of the delays allows the project lead to develop targeted solutions to address the specific challenges, such as improving working conditions, implementing health measures, or adjusting schedules, thereby helping to get the project back on track.
In the face of delays caused by difficult working conditions, including team sickness and absences, the project lead should first focus on understanding the root causes of the issues. Option B, identifying the causes to find a suitable solution, is the most appropriate course of action for the following reasons:
The choice between these options depends on the project lead's assessment of the specific situation. If the causes of team sickness and absences are primarily related to factors beyond the project scope (such as external health factors or personal circumstances), Option B may be more appropriate. If there is evidence that scope complexities are a significant contributor to the challenges, Option C could be considered. Ideally, a combination of both options may provide a comprehensive solution: identifying causes (Option B) and, if applicable, adjusting scope (Option C) based on the findings.
This is funny! The issues are already listed clearly in the question – sickness, isolated location, difficult working conditions. I don’t understand how B is the right answer – Identifying issues and finding solution. In fact A or C or D seem to be more practical considering the situation of the question.
Why isnt there a need to identify the cause for difficult working conditions, sickness and absences?
C is the answer. it cant be B because you already know the causes. Read the question before you answer
Additionally, reviewing the project scope (option C) may help in finding ways to simplify the project or adjust timelines to accommodate the challenges. This approach allows for a more comprehensive and effective strategy in addressing the specific issues mentioned in the question.