A customer wants to combine multiple Ethernet interfaces into a single virtual interface using link aggregation.
What is the valid naming convention for aggregate interfaces?
A customer wants to combine multiple Ethernet interfaces into a single virtual interface using link aggregation.
What is the valid naming convention for aggregate interfaces?
The valid naming convention for aggregate interfaces in many networking devices, particularly those following the Juniper Networks' Junos OS naming scheme, is commonly represented as 'ae.x', where 'ae' stands for aggregate Ethernet and 'x' is the interface number. Therefore, 'ae.1' is the correct naming convention for an aggregate interface in this context.
In the field adjacent to the read-only Interface Name , enter a number to identify the aggregate group. The range is 1 to the maximum number of aggregate interface groups supported by the firewall. https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-networking-admin/configure-interfaces/configure-an-aggregate-interface-group
C chrisy042 is correct!
C is correct
C. 100 percent!