A customer wants to combine multiple Ethernet interfaces into a single virtual interface using link aggregation.
Which two formats are correct for naming aggregate interfaces? (Choose two.)
A customer wants to combine multiple Ethernet interfaces into a single virtual interface using link aggregation.
Which two formats are correct for naming aggregate interfaces? (Choose two.)
When creating an aggregated Ethernet interface, the standard nomenclature is 'ae' followed by a period and an identifier number. Therefore, 'ae.8' and 'ae.1' are correct formats for naming aggregate interfaces.
Correct Answer: AC
I guess AC but none are correct because the dot would be for subinterfaces on the aggregate... still the aggregate would be numbered... e.g. ae1 and ae8 would be valid
A and C are correct https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/network/network-interfaces/aggregate-ethernet-ae-interface-group.html
A and C are correct
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-web-interface-help/network/network-interfaces/aggregate-ethernet-ae-interface-group
Correct Answer: AC