What is an advantage public cloud WildFire has over the private WildFire appliance?
What is an advantage public cloud WildFire has over the private WildFire appliance?
Public cloud WildFire has the advantage of making signatures available within minutes to protect global users once malware has been submitted. This rapid dissemination of signatures ensures that users globally benefit from the latest security updates almost immediately, something a private WildFire appliance may lack in terms of speed and breadth of distribution.
I say A is the correct one because private WildFire appliance automatically deploy protection across local next-generation firewalls. I discard: B- Private and public cloud generate malware reports. C- The WF engine (private or cloud) do the analysis in different OS. D- WF appliance can also generate AV and DNS signatures, also URL categories.
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/wildfire/9-1/wildfire-admin/wildfire-overview/wildfire-deployments/wildfire-private-cloud
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/advanced-wildfire/administration/advanced-wildfire-overview/advanced-wildfire-subscription WildFire private cloud analysis does not support APK, Mac OS X, Linux (ELF), archive (RAR/7-Zip), and script (JS, BAT, VBS, Shell Script, PS1, and HTA) files
A is correct
A is correct
Private WF, doesn't update DNS an URL db.
and Public WF does?