Given:
public class Test
private T t;
public T get () {
return t;
}
public void set (T t) {
this.t = t;
}
public static void main (String args [ ] ) {
Test
Test type 1 = new Test (); //line n1
type.set("Java");
type1.set(100); //line n2
System.out.print(type.get() + " " + type1.get());
}
}
What is the result?
The given code tries to create a generic class Test that can handle objects of type T. From the code, type is defined as Test<String> and type1 is defined as Test. The problem arises when type1.set(100) is called. The raw type Test (without specifying the type parameter) is being used, which causes unsafe operations. In a strict coding environment, this should lead to a compilation error. To rectify, Test should be given a specific type, e.g., Test<Integer> type1 = new Test<>(); and the appropriate adjustments should be made in the code.
It prints "Java 100". Tested
It should print "Java 100"
A -> prints "Java 100"