A customer needs a DR solution designed around the following requirements:
✑ There are 8 ms of latency between Sites A and B
✑ The administrator needs the shortest RPO/RTO possible
✑ Application consistent snapshots are required
✑ Use of Nutanix VSS
Which Data Protection Method should be used?
The best Data Protection Method for the given requirements is Metro Availability. Metro Availability provides synchronous replication, which ensures the shortest RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective). This method supports application-consistent snapshots and can handle the 8 ms latency between Sites A and B. Additionally, it allows the use of Nutanix VSS, fulfilling all the customer's requirements.
But you can add more snapshot schedules each 1 hr, it supports application consistent snapshots.
Response A. NearSync doesn't support application consistent https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/details?targetId=Prism-Element-Data-Protection-Guide-v6_0:wc-cluster-dr-nearsync-limitations-r.html
C can be correct now as NearSync can support application-consistent snapshots from AOS 5.20 onwards. However, minutely snapshots are not application-consistent but hourly snapshots are. Source: https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/details?targetId=Prism-Element-Data-Protection-Guide-v5_20:wc-dr-near-sync-c.html
A is correct C. is incorrect + NearSync does not support application-consistent snapshots + NearSync replication schedules of less than 15 minutes do not support self-service restore. https://portal.nutanix.com/page/documents/details?targetId=Prism-Element-Data-Protection-Guide-v6_6:wc-cluster-dr-nearsync-limitations-r.html
can not be NearSync.because of app consistency
Due to app consistency it cannot be NearSync.