A manufacturing company is planning to deploy Mule applications to its own Azure Kubernetes Service infrastructure.
The organization wants to make the Mule applications more available and robust by deploying each Mule application to an isolated Mule runtime in a Docker container while managing all the Mule applications from the MuleSoft-hosted control plane.
What is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) choice of runtime plane to meet these organizational requirements?
Anypoint Runtime Fabric is the most suitable choice for deploying Mule applications in a Kubernetes environment while maintaining management capabilities from the MuleSoft-hosted control plane. It allows for the deployment of isolated Mule runtimes in Docker containers, which aligns with the requirements of enhancing availability and robustness for the Mule applications.
Its answer B.
ChatGPT: The most idiomatic choice of runtime plane for deploying Mule applications to an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) infrastructure while managing them from the MuleSoft-hosted control plane is: B. Anypoint Runtime Fabric