You are an architect implementing a Dynamics 365 Finance environment.
You need to analyze test results generated by the development team.
Which tool should you use?
You are an architect implementing a Dynamics 365 Finance environment.
You need to analyze test results generated by the development team.
Which tool should you use?
SysTest is the correct tool to use for analyzing test results generated by the development team in a Dynamics 365 Finance environment. SysTest is a framework specifically designed for authoring, running, and managing unit and component tests, which are integral to the development process. It provides detailed feedback that helps both developers and architects in assessing the correctness and performance of the code. Other options like Trace parser, Task Recorder, and Regression suite automation tool serve different purposes such as performance analysis, process recording, and automated task execution respectively, but are not primarily used for the direct analysis of test results from development.
Trace parser is for server environments, RSAT is for UAT. Meanwhile both task recorder and SysTest are for analyzing test results. However since this is for development, I would take SysTest as that makes analyzing result more efficient.
You can use trace parser on D365FO. The answer is correct. Development team will do testing using sysTest. Solution Architect wants to analyze the test results by Development team, to confirm their assertions, then Trace parser comes in handy, by tracing the customization done and be sure of performance.
I agree with you, A is correct, SysTest is test solution fordevelopment team and The TraceParser can use to consume traces and analyze performance in your deployment.
D is correct option. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/perf-test/testing-support
As architect implementing a Dynamics 365 Finance environment, I don't open Visual tool, so my option es RSAT
https://community.dynamics.com/365/financeandoperations/f/dynamics-365-for-finance-and-operations-forum/297404/systest-framework-in-d365/860181
Very tricky question. I would say SysTest
RSAT is perfect for analysing results and ensuring that development doesn't negatively impact existing functionality. It has reports on automated tests for reviewing results. Trace parser is used for diagnostics and performance analysis but it doesn't generate tests nor does it review tests. SysTest is for devs and Task recorder is out of question.
A is correct
D is correct.
SysTest framework is primarily designed for unit tests and component tests in Dynamics 365. And unit tests are done by dev
Answer by BingChat: " The correct answer is C. Regression suite automation tool (RSAT). RSAT is a tool that allows you to record business tasks using Task Recorder and then convert them into a suite of automated tests, without having to write source code. RSAT is fully integrated with Azure DevOps for test execution, reporting, and investigation. You can use RSAT to analyze test results generated by the development team and compare them with the expected outcomes. Trace parser is a tool that helps you analyze performance issues and identify the root causes of slow-running code. Task Recorder is a tool that helps you create documentation and training materials by recording business processes. SysTest is a framework that helps you author unit and component test code in Visual Studio. These tools are not designed for analyzing test results generated by the development team. "
D - SysTest. See: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/perf-test/testing-validation