You create a network region named Region1 in Microsoft Teams.
You are adding a network site to Region1. The site has a 1.5-Mb connection.
You need to ensure that all users at the site have a good voice experience.
What should you do?
You create a network region named Region1 in Microsoft Teams.
You are adding a network site to Region1. The site has a 1.5-Mb connection.
You need to ensure that all users at the site have a good voice experience.
What should you do?
In order to ensure that all users at the site have a good voice experience, the most appropriate action is to disable IP video for the Region1 users. This approach will free up bandwidth, ensuring that the limited 1.5 Mb connection is sufficient for high-quality voice transmission. Disabling video will prevent bandwidth competition between voice and video streams, thereby enhancing voice quality.
C is the answer
The scenario is for a specific site that is bandwidth challenged and mentions a "good voice experience" but doesn't specifically mention meetings. Options B & D specifically apply to meetings. Network Roaming Policies (option C) seem like the right option
This option directly addresses the network bandwidth available at the site and adjusts the media bit rate accordingly for a better voice experience.
I think B as for C - Creating and assigning a Teams Network Roaming Policy: Roaming policies are primarily designed to manage network connectivity when users move between locations, not for optimizing bandwidth usage within a specific site.
This setting determines the media bit rate for audio, video, and video-based app sharing in meetings for people in your organization. This setting gives you granular control over managing bandwidth in your organization. Depending on the meetings scenario, we recommend to have enough bandwidth in place for a good quality experience. The minimum value is 50 Kbps and the maximum value depends on the meeting scenario. For meetings that need the highest quality video experience, such as CEO board meetings and Teams live events, we recommend you set the bandwidth to 10 Mbps.
Not quite sure if it is C or D. C would make more sense as disabling video would ensure voice quality is better https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/network-roaming-policy
Option A: Tagging all traffic with a DSCP (Differentiated Services Code Point) value of 46 is a common practice for prioritizing voice over IP (VoIP) traffic in a network. This could help ensure a good voice experience by giving voice traffic higher priority over other types of traffic. Option B: Assigning the Region1 users a meeting policy that has IP video disabled could potentially improve voice experience by reducing the overall bandwidth usage. However, this would also mean that users won’t be able to use video in their meetings. Option C: Creating and assigning a Teams Network Roaming Policy that has IP video disabled is similar to Option B. It could improve voice quality by reducing bandwidth usage, but at the cost of disabling video. Option D: Assigning the Region1 users a meeting policy that has a media bit rate of 1,500 Kbs could potentially improve voice quality by limiting the amount of bandwidth that can be used for media in Teams meetings. However, this would also limit the quality of video and other media.
I think is A, the statement is about how to implement QoS A- A QoS implementation will acomplish the mission prioritizing the voice stream over the others, so that, we just need to prioritize voice traffic through a DSCP tag. C- It dissables a feature that might be necessary. D - It will apply to all the streams (audio,video, content sharing) and it isn't focusing on voice experience. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/qos-in-teams#best-practice
Tagging —all— traffic (option A) with DSCP46 will not ensure a better handling of voice modality.