Exam MS-102 All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Go to Exam
Question 242

HOTSPOT

-

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription that contains the users shown in the following table.

The subscription has the following two anti-spam policies:

• Name: AntiSpam1

• Priority: 0

• Include these users, groups and domains

• Users: User3

• Groups: Group1

• Exclude these users, groups and domains

• Groups: Group2

• Message limits

• Set a daily message limit: 100

• Name: AntiSpam2

• Priority: 1

• Include these users, groups and domains

• Users: User1

• Groups: Group2

• Exclude these users, groups and domains

• Users: User3

• Message limits

• Set a daily message limit: 50

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

    Correct Answer:

Discussion
aleksdj

N User1 max 50 users per day because both Antispam policies apply for User1 but the least privilege counts, so 50. Y User2 is in Group1 and 2, so both Antispam policies apply but the least privilege counts, so 50 N User3 is excluded from Antispam1 (Group2 excluded) and Antispam2 (User3 exluded)

itguys

With Anti-spam, anti-phishing and anti-malware policies (also CA policies), exclusion takes precedence over inclusion Answers are correct FYI the opposite is true fo safe-links and safe-attachment policies - inclusion takes precedence over exclusion

Amir1909

- No - No - No

DiligentSam

I think User 3 match PolicyName:Anti-spam 1 so the 3rd option is Yes

DiligentSam

i am sorry , policy 1 exclude group2 ,and user3 is a member of group 2

60ed5c2

Policy 1 includes user3 AND excludes group2 of which user 3 is a member. User3 is both included and excluded. Wouldn't the rule of more restrictive apply and therefore user3 would be included?

timkuo1009

I think is N, Y, Y Once User3 is included to AntiSpam1, user 3 will not be applied to Antispam2 policy. Refer to the following document The priority order matters if you have the same recipient intentionally or unintentionally included in multiple policies, because only the first policy of that type (anti-spam, anti-malware, anti-phishing, etc.) is applied to that recipient, regardless of how many other policies that the recipient is included in. There's never a merging or combining of the settings in multiple policies for the recipient. The recipient is unaffected by the settings of the remaining policies of that type. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/office-365-security/how-policies-and-protections-are-combined?view=o365-worldwide

timkuo1009

Sorry, my mistake, user3 is excluded from antispm1 (Group2 is excluded). user3 will be applied to aptispam2. Answer is N,Y, N

belyo

The processing of anti-phishing policies stops for all included recipients, so AntiSpam2 is never applied to recipients who are also in AntiSpam1. AntiSpam1 - user 1 & user 3 (as exclusion wins over inclusion) AntiSpam2 - user 2 only (user 1 & user 3 are already in higher prio policy) answer should be NO YES YES https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/how-policies-and-protections-are-combined?view=o365-worldwide#:~:text=The%20processing%20of%20anti%2Dphishing%20policies%20stops%20for%20all%20included%20recipients%2C%20so%20Policy%20B%20is%20never%20applied%20to%20recipients%20who%20are%20also%20in%20Policy%20A.

Blasty

I would say: No, because the antispam1 policy applies and therefore the limit is not 150 messages per day but 100 messages Yes, because the exclude for group 2 prevails the include for antispam1 and therefore the antispam2 is applies on user2 No, because the exclude for group 2 prevails the include for user3 in antispam1 and therefore antispam2 applies on user3

9711d59

Different conditions use AND logic (for example, <recipient1> and <member of group 1>). The recipient must satisfy all of the specified conditions, which is typically difficult or redundant. Nobody apply to this rule so Y Y Y.