PL-400 Exam QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Go to Exam

PL-400 Exam - Question 96

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than once correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant app.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Use the maker portal to export the custom connector. Then use the maker portal to import the connector into the production environment.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Answer
Correct Answer: B

The solution does not meet the goal because there is no direct export option for custom connectors through the maker portal. Instead, you must add the custom connector into a solution and then export the entire solution package. This approach ensures that the custom connector can be properly imported into the production environment while maintaining visibility and accessibility constraints for users within the tenant.

Discussion

4 comments
Sign in to comment
hai297Option: B
Apr 5, 2024

No. No export option for custom connector. The solution is add custom connector to solution then export

alexandramarchis
Sep 30, 2024

The scenario specifies that the custom connector is tied to a single-tenant Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function, meaning it must be restricted to users within the tenant. While using the maker portal to export and import the connector would move it between environments, this approach does not explicitly ensure that the connector remains visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

loftuscheekOption: A
Feb 28, 2025

correct

Juan0414Option: A
Mar 4, 2025

None of the other options for this series of questions are correct, so this one should be. This is the standard procedure for migrating solutions, but you could say that it does not guarantee that connector "must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant" because someone could send the exported solution to another person outside the tenant for them to export it there. But I think that is just overthinking the question and this should be the option to use

JN_Kanan
May 5, 2025

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than once correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. So there are chances that none of the solutions are correct. But not sure about this, just letting you know we can't go with your assumption.