Which three statements are correct about multitenancy in a Junos EVPN environment? (Choose three.)
Which three statements are correct about multitenancy in a Junos EVPN environment? (Choose three.)
Multitenancy in a Junos EVPN environment involves the ability to manage multiple tenants within the network infrastructure. MAC-VRF instances allow for overlapping routes and VLANs, ensuring that multiple tenants can have overlapping address spaces without conflict. VRF instances permit the use of overlapping subnets by different tenants by creating isolated routing tables. Virtual switch instances allow for overlapping VLANs, thus supporting isolated Layer 2 domains for different tenants.
BCE should be correct
I think ACD is correct. Virtual switch instances dos NOT allow VLAN overlapping and MAC-VRF instances do NOT allow for varying EVPN
I think is BCE
should be BCE - B: In a Junos EVPN environment, MAC-VRF instances provide logical isolation, allowing different EVPN services to be configured and run on the same device for different tenants. C: - Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances in Junos EVPN allow for the creation of isolated routing tables, which means that overlapping subnets can be used by different tenants without conflicts. E: Virtual switch instances in Junos EVPN allow for the creation of isolated Layer 2 domains, and they support overlapping VLANs for different tenants.