Which of the following is a typical characteristic of the WALKTHROUGH review type?
Which of the following is a typical characteristic of the WALKTHROUGH review type?
A walkthrough review is a type of review where the meeting is led by the author of the document or code under review. The primary purpose of a walkthrough is for the author to present their material to a group of peers and solicit feedback. Attendees are typically not required to prepare beforehand, and the focus is on understanding the content and catching obvious errors. Metrics gathering, defined entry, and exit criteria are more characteristic of more formal review types like inspections.
A is correct because reviewer should be technical peers of the author
A is correct
A is correct
A id correct
The solution is in the name - a walkthrough review means someone is there to "walk the reviewers through" the system. Gathering some metrics throughout the process, though, seems like a good idea, too ...
Preparation by the attendees is not required for a walkthrough review - there is someone walking them through the process or system, so they don't have to prepare. Due to the same reason, there cannot be entry or exit criteria, there is no one prescribed path to follow.