Which of the following is NOT a major regulatory framework?
Which of the following is NOT a major regulatory framework?
FIPS 140-2 is not a major regulatory framework. It is a specific set of guidelines and requirements related to cryptographic security used primarily by U.S. government agencies and their contractors. In contrast, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and SOX are all significant regulatory frameworks in various industries. HIPAA regulates healthcare information, SOX oversees corporate financial practices, and PCI DSS governs payment card data security. These are critical regulations designed to protect data and ensure compliance within their respective fields, whereas FIPS 140-2 is a technical standard and not a broad regulatory framework applicable across multiple industries.
PCI is not regulatory it's a standard
how is pci gegulatory
I think the answer should be PCI dss
both PCSI DSS and FIPS are not regulatory framework
If Answer is D then question should be asked in different wording. It should include compliance framework
FIPS is the worst answer so I'll just roll with that one.
I agree, PCI is not even created by the government. FIPS should be the answer.
PCI DSS is a regulatory framework; while FIPS-140 is just a standard which has four levels.
Correction: PCI DSS is a compliance framework
Frameworks created by a group of industries are also considered regulatory (in that sector). PCI is mandatory for companies processing card payments.
Also, the key work in the question is 'major'. That's why FIPS is not the answer.
My choice is answer "D". FIPS 140-2 is important, especially for government agencies and their contractors, it is not a broad regulatory framework that applies to a wide range of industries or organizations. Instead, it is a specific set of guidelines and requirements related to cryptographic security.
PCI is not regulatory (Not from government)
PCI isn't a regulatory framework by law, but it is so to an industry. My answer is "D"
It's 100% D. FIPS 140-2 (Federal Information Processing Standard 140-2) is a standard for cryptographic modules used by U.S. federal agencies and contractors. While it is widely recognized, it is not a regulatory framework. Instead, it provides specific technical requirements for cryptographic module validation.
FIPS 140-2 (Federal Information Processing Standard 140-2) is a cryptographic standard, not a regulatory framework. It defines security requirements for cryptographic modules used in federal systems but does not regulate industries like PCI DSS, HIPAA, or SOX. PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is technically a security standard, but it is often treated as a regulatory framework because it enforces strict security requirements on businesses handling credit card transactions. Why is PCI DSS considered a regulatory framework? Mandatory Compliance: Businesses that process, store, or transmit credit card data must comply with PCI DSS to avoid fines, legal risks, and potential loss of card-processing privileges. Industry Enforcement: While not a law, PCI DSS is enforced by major payment card brands (Visa, MasterCard, Amex, etc.) through contracts and penalties. Compliance Audits: Organizations must undergo regular audits (PCI DSS assessments) to prove compliance.