Which of the following approaches provides the BEST assurance and user confidence when an organization migrates data to a more complex enterprise resource planning (ERP) system?
Which of the following approaches provides the BEST assurance and user confidence when an organization migrates data to a more complex enterprise resource planning (ERP) system?
User acceptance testing (UAT) provides the best assurance and user confidence when migrating data to a more complex enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. UAT involves end-users testing the system in real-world scenarios to ensure it meets their needs and functions correctly before going live. This thorough testing process helps to identify and resolve any issues, providing assurance that the system will work as expected and fostering user confidence in the new ERP system.
Answer: C option A&B may not provide the same level of assurance and user confidence as phased changeover in the context of migrating to a more complex ERP system.
I'm going with B. Key word is "Assurance" UAT does not provide assurance although it may help with gaining user confidence.
parallel processing won't gain users confidence because the old system being available they won't use new one.
should be A
should be C
Parallel processing (option B) involves running both the old and new systems simultaneously for a period, which can be resource-intensive and complex. It requires synchronization of data between systems and can lead to confusion if discrepancies arise between the old and new systems. Therefore, phased changeover is generally considered the BEST approach for ensuring assurance and user confidence when migrating data to a more complex ERP system.
A is correct.
C is correct
UAT could be the most appropriate answer as the question is about most confidence.. so A