A system development project is experiencing delays due to ongoing staff shortages. Which of the following strategies would provide the GREATEST assurance of system quality at implementation?
A system development project is experiencing delays due to ongoing staff shortages. Which of the following strategies would provide the GREATEST assurance of system quality at implementation?
To ensure system quality at implementation despite delays caused by staff shortages, the best strategy is to deliver only the core functionality on the initial target date. This approach focuses on completing the essential features needed for the system to operate effectively, allowing for thorough testing and quality assurance within the limited resources. It reduces the risk of bugs and issues that might arise from trying to deliver a fully-featured system without adequate staff, thus providing greater assurance of system quality.
None of the other options addresses the underlying issue of staff shortage
B. Deliver only the core functionality on the initial target date.
I think the answer is B
Should be B
B. Deliver only the core functionality on the initial target date. Can't be D since IS staff cannot develop
no way IS staff can do development, makes no sense Answer is B
Answer is B oh
B is the answer
Since the question is about the development of a Minimum Viable Product, B is the correct answer.
Terrible question. It depends much on the company's contex, and there is much missing information on that. How am I supposed to know that hiring staff will be approved? I real life that process usually takes several months and probably an ongoing project would delay anyway.