In a multinational organization, local security regulations should be implemented over global security policy because:
In a multinational organization, local security regulations should be implemented over global security policy because:
In a multinational organization, local security regulations should take precedence over global security policy because the requirements of local regulations are mandatory and enforceable by law. Adhering to local regulations is essential to ensure legal compliance within each region the organization operates in. Failure to comply with local regulations could result in legal penalties, financial loss, and reputational damage. Therefore, local regulations must be given priority to meet the legal requirements specific to each locality.
In a multinational organization, local security regulations should take precedence because different countries may have specific laws and regulations regarding information security and data protection. Adhering to local regulations is crucial to ensure compliance with the legal requirements of each region in which the organization operates. This helps avoid legal and regulatory issues and ensures that the organization's security practices align with local laws. While options A, B, and C may be factors to consider in certain situations, the primary reason for implementing local security regulations over global security policy is the need to comply with the specific requirements of each locality.
Viperhunter
Location is always considered first, this runs closely with the Data Sovereignty definition in CISM-AIO v2
Local Regulations as in GDPR, California Act - Law of Land takes precedence
requirements of local regulations take precedence
Agreed
Local laws takes precedence
D. requirements of local regulations take precedence
Local regulations take precedence
Local regulations take precedence
Law of Land takes precedence
B. deploying awareness of local regulations is more practical than of global policy.
D is right.