Which is the BEST method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required?
Which is the BEST method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required?
A parallel test is the most appropriate method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required. This type of test involves running both the primary and alternate processing sites simultaneously, allowing live data and transactions to be processed in real-time at both locations. It enables a direct comparison of performance between the two sites and validates the operational capabilities of the alternate site without disrupting service, thereby ensuring continuous uptime.
C. Parallel test
C. Parallel Test parallel test is the most appropriate method for evaluating the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required, as it allows for a direct comparison of performance and validation of the alternate site's capabilities.
A full interruption test is the BEST method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required. This is because it simulates a real-world outage and tests the ability of the alternate processing site to take over operations.
It should be A or D. C is wrong, you have to test the switch and make sure the alternate site is able to stand up when the main site is down.
OMG, what a badly written question... Is by "when continuous uptime is required" meant that continuous uptime is required during the test (which would make C - parallel test the most appropriate answer) or is continuous uptime required to be achieved/tested (in which case the correct answer here would be A - full interruption test). Since I'm thinking it's the former, I vote C here.
parallel test. This allows for testing without taking the main offline. If you do a full interruption test and your alternate site fails then you have just taken everything offline for a test specifically when the question states it requires continuous uptime. So, keep your main running a do a parallel test.
a is the answer
C: Parallel test, as the best method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required. A parallel test involves running both the primary and alternate processing sites simultaneously, where live data and transactions are processed in real-time at both locations. This allows for a direct comparison between the primary and alternate sites, evaluating their performance, reliability, and effectiveness in maintaining continuous uptime. By conducting a parallel test, organizations can validate the readiness and capabilities of their alternate processing site, ensuring seamless transition and minimal downtime in case of any disruptions or failures at the primary site. This method provides a comprehensive assessment of the alternate site's ability to handle critical operations and maintain continuous service availability.
Parallel test
C. Parallel Test