Which of the following techniques is MOST appropriate for verifying application program controls?
Which of the following techniques is MOST appropriate for verifying application program controls?
The most appropriate technique for verifying application program controls is the use of test data. This method involves inputting mock data into the system and analyzing the output to check the system’s behavior against expected results. This allows for the examination of how the system processes data and validates the effectiveness of application program controls. Other techniques, such as observation of data entry, statistical sampling, and code review, do not directly and comprehensively assess the actual processing controls within the application as effectively as using test data does.
I'm going with C. Using test data. Non-operational, non-impact, and can see the test results. I'm not sure that auditors are SME's at reviewing code, enough to look for defects.
D IS AnSWER
D. Code review
Code review involves examining the source code of an application to identify errors, vulnerabilities, and deviations from coding standards. This process allows for a thorough assessment of the implementation of application program controls within the code itself. By reviewing the code, auditors can evaluate the logic and functionality of the controls, ensuring they are correctly implemented to achieve the desired security, integrity, and reliability objectives. While the use of test data (Option C) is also an important technique for testing and validating application program controls, it primarily focuses on assessing the functionality and performance of the application, rather than directly verifying the implementation of controls within the code.
Using test data is the most appropriate technique for verifying application program controls. This method involves inputting mock data into the system and subsequently analyzing the output. This allows examination of how the system processes data and enables the verification of system behavior against expected results. It is especially beneficial in testing application program controls as it can help identify any weaknesses or errors in the system's processing controls. Other techniques such as observation of data entry, statistical sampling, and code review does not directly validate the processing controls within the application.
https://owasp.org/www-pdf-archive/OWASP_Code_Review_Guide_v2.pdf What is Secure Code Review? Code review aims to identify security flaws in the application related to its features and design, along with the exact root causes. With the increasing complexity of applications and the advent of new technologies, the traditional way of testing may fail to detect all the security flaws present in the applications. One must understand the code of the application, external components, and configurations to have a better chance of finding the flaws. Such a deep dive into the application code also helps in determining exact mitigation techniques that can be used to avert the security flaws. It is the process of auditing the source code of an application to verify that the proper security and logical controls are present, that they work as intended, and that they have been invoked in the right places. Code review is a way of helping ensure that the application has been developed so as to be “self-defending” in its given environment.