A senior auditor is reviewing work papers prepared by a junior auditor indicating that a finding was removed after the auditee said they corrected the problem.
Which of the following is the senior auditor's MOST appropriate course of action?
A senior auditor is reviewing work papers prepared by a junior auditor indicating that a finding was removed after the auditee said they corrected the problem.
Which of the following is the senior auditor's MOST appropriate course of action?
The senior auditor's most appropriate course of action is to have the finding reinstated. This is because audit findings should remain in the work papers until there is evidence that the issue has been fully resolved. Removing a finding based solely on the auditee's word without verification undermines the integrity of the audit process. The senior auditor should ensure that the corrective action has been properly validated before approving any changes to the audit findings.
B.. Removing the findings is not a way. Findings at the inception of audit should be reported alogwith any corrective actions if taken. since the question is of most appropriate action B could be the correct answer.
Refer the issue to the audit director Referring the issue to the audit director is a reasonable course of action. The audit director would have the experience and expertise necessary to review the situation and make an informed decision about the appropriate next steps
In conclusion, while each of the four options has its merits, the most appropriate course of action for the senior auditor in this scenario is likely to refer the issue to the audit director. The audit director can review the situation, provide guidance on next steps, and help ensure that the audit process is conducted in accordance with established standards.
B is the rightanswer. Have the finding reinstated.
Must be B
B IT is
Correct answer must be B
answer is B
Why not A? Auditee said they corrected the problem, so you retest to confirm the remediation.