An application development team is also promoting changes to production for a critical financial application. Which of the following is the BEST control to reduce the associated risk?
An application development team is also promoting changes to production for a critical financial application. Which of the following is the BEST control to reduce the associated risk?
The best control to reduce the associated risk when promoting changes to production for a critical financial application is implementing a change management code review. Code reviews help ensure that changes are examined for quality, security, and compliance before being deployed to production, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of a critical financial system. This minimizes the risk of introducing defects or security vulnerabilities and ensures that any issues can be identified and addressed early in the development process.
Implementing a change management code review is the best control in this context to reduce the associated risk. Code reviews help ensure that changes to the critical financial application are thoroughly examined for quality, security, and compliance before being promoted to production. This practice can catch potential issues early in the development process and prevent them from reaching the production environment. While other options such as performing periodic audits, performing regression tests, and exporting change logs are important, a code review is particularly effective for ensuring the quality and security of the actual code being deployed.
In the context of a critical financial application, both code review and regression testing are valuable controls. However, for reducing the associated risk of a specific change, regression testing has a slight edge: C is also to be consider
Code reviews are an effective means of mitigating risk, especially in critical systems such as financial applications.