Transaction records from a business database were inadvertently deleted, and system operators decided to restore from a snapshot copy. Which of the following provides the BEST assurance that the transactions were recovered successfully?
Transaction records from a business database were inadvertently deleted, and system operators decided to restore from a snapshot copy. Which of the following provides the BEST assurance that the transactions were recovered successfully?
The best way to assure that transactions were recovered successfully is to compare transaction values against external statements to verify their accuracy. This method ensures that not only are all transactions accounted for, but also that the data within those transactions is correct and consistent with external records. This provides a holistic verification approach, ensuring both completeness and accuracy.
B. Compare transaction values against external statements to verify accuracy.
Transaction recovery logs typically provide a detailed record of the recovery process, including any errors or issues encountered during the restoration. By reviewing these logs, one can ensure that the recovery process was completed without errors and that all transactions were successfully restored.
After reconsidering option D, it's clear that while reviewing transaction recovery logs ensures that the recovery process did not encounter errors, it does not directly confirm the accuracy or completeness of the recovered transaction data. Therefore, the best assurance still lies with: B. Compare transaction values against external statements to verify accuracy
Transaction count show how many lines are in the table, its value are not validated. The backup machine may differ from the live environment. The recovery process could run without error if the missing transactions was not selected for recovery. The only option is to compare the results with some system-independent data.