Which of the following should be an information security managers PRIMARY focus during the development of a critical system storing highly confidential data?
Which of the following should be an information security managers PRIMARY focus during the development of a critical system storing highly confidential data?
During the development of a critical system storing highly confidential data, the primary focus of an information security manager should be ensuring the amount of residual risk is acceptable. This involves identifying, assessing, and managing risks to mitigate them to a level that is tolerable for the organization. While complying with regulatory requirements is important, it represents a baseline. The notion of residual risk directly relates to the overall effectiveness of the security measures implemented, ensuring the protection of sensitive data beyond mere compliance.
some sites are saying its D which does not name sense to me it should be A
it actually doesnt makes sense to me
Answer should be A. Alot of people are saying D but Clcomplying with regulatory requirements is also important, but it should not be the primary focus. Regulatory requirements provide a minimum level of security that must be met, but they do not necessarily ensure that the system is adequately protected. The focus should be on managing risk, rather than simply complying with regulations. The primary focus of an information security manager during the development of a critical system storing highly confidential data should be to ensure that the amount of residual risk is acceptable. Residual risk is the level of risk that remains after security controls have been implemented. It is important to ensure that this residual risk is at an acceptable level, given the sensitivity of the data being stored.
The answer is D simply because when developing a system storing private and confidential data you will to be in compliance data and privacy laws and regulations..
D . Once you are keeping the highly sensitive information , the criticality could not be decided by a company , may judged by higher level (eg., law ). Make less sense to a company whether they think the risk is acceptable or not.
Teh correct aswer is A
When it comes to data - It is always about regulatory requirements. There are many security measures to put in place but it is all gear towards regulatory requirements.
While all the options are important considerations, ensuring the amount of residual risk is acceptable is the primary concern. Residual risk is the level of risk that remains after security controls and measures have been implemented. In the context of a critical system storing highly confidential data, it is crucial to assess the effectiveness of security controls and ensure that the remaining risk is at an acceptable level. This involves considering the specific risks associated with the system, the sensitivity of the data, and the potential impact of security incidents. Complying with regulatory requirements (option D) is also important, but it is often addressed as part of the broader risk management process.
It's a tought one... :/ I would lean towards A, though because focusing solely on compliance might lead to a checkbox approach, where meeting the minimum requirements doesn't guarantee robust protection for highly sensitive data. Therefore, ensuring an acceptable level of residual risk is paramount because compliance doesn't cover all risks - regulations may not account for all potential threats or vulnerabilities specific to a particular system or data type.
the amount of residual risk acceptable varies from company to company, companies have different security posture, therefore, an organisation might accept a level of risk that could negatively impact the regulations. D is the answer.
I think that you need to Comply with Regulatory requirements in order to ensure that "Highly Confidential data" will be protected at best.
residual risk comes after putting the right controls for a specific risk , since its "Developing" that means there is no applicability yet for residual risk. D is the most logical answer .
Option D, "Complying with regulatory requirements," is a critical aspect of managing the security of a system that stores highly confidential data. However, it is considered a baseline requirement, not the primary focus. Compliance ensures that the system meets legal and regulatory standards, but it does not necessarily mean that the data is secure to the level the organization might require. The primary focus is on managing risk to an acceptable level (Option A), which encompasses compliance as one of its components.
A is correct!
Complying with regulatory requirements (option D) is also important, but it is not the primary focus during the development of the system. Compliance with regulations is typically addressed as part of the overall risk management process, which includes assessing and mitigating risks to ensure compliance.
the best choice of answer is B the primary reason of information security manager is to reduce the number of vulnerability to make sure the data is secure
reg compliance should be treated as any other.
A. Ensuring the amount of residual risk is acceptable ISACA's Focus: ISACA's frameworks often stress the importance of identifying, assessing, and managing risks to ensure they are within the organization's risk tolerance. This entails implementing controls to mitigate risks to an acceptable level. Primary Focus: This aligns closely with ISACA's emphasis on risk management and governance, making it the most likely primary focus according to ISACA principles.
If i comply with the regulatory requirements, there should be no worried about the residual risk