Which of the following is the BEST report for an IS auditor to reference when tasked with reviewing the security of code written for a newly developed website?
Which of the following is the BEST report for an IS auditor to reference when tasked with reviewing the security of code written for a newly developed website?
The best report for an IS auditor to reference when tasked with reviewing the security of code written for a newly developed website is the web application vulnerability report. This type of report directly focuses on identifying and assessing vulnerabilities specific to web applications, including those that could be present in the code. While other reports like penetration test reports or static software composition analysis provide valuable insights, they might not be as comprehensive or focused specifically on web application vulnerabilities, making the web application vulnerability report the most suitable choice.
b is answer
D: Refer to OWASP report is the best report.
Static software composition analysis
Q: BEST REPORT for reviewing the SECURITY OF CODE written for a newly developed website? Answer: C A static software composition analysis (SCA) report primarily focuses on identifying vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and components used in the software. While this type of analysis is valuable for identifying potential security issues arising from dependencies on external code, it may not provide comprehensive coverage of security issues specific to the custom code written for the website. Penetration testing, on the other hand, involves actively probing and testing the website's code, configuration, and overall security posture by simulating real-world attack scenarios. This type of testing is more likely to uncover vulnerabilities specific to the custom code and implementation of the website, making the penetration test report a better choice for reviewing the security of the website's code.
By using static analysis tools to analyze source code, you can identify problems early in each process of a development project, allowing for quick fixes and reducing the cost of fixing bugs throughout the project.
While web application vulnerability reports (Option D) are valuable for assessing the security of a website, they primarily focus on testing the website in its deployed state and identifying vulnerabilities from an external perspective. On the other hand, static software composition analysis (Option B) specifically examines the codebase itself, making it the BEST choice for reviewing the security of code written for a newly developed website.
C. Penetration test report Penetration testing involves actively probing a system to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses, including those within the code of a web application. This type of testing simulates real-world attacks and provides valuable insights into potential security risks. A penetration test report would detail the findings, vulnerabilities discovered, and recommendations for remediation, making it an essential reference for an IS auditor assessing the security of a newly developed website. While the other options (A. Black box testing report, B. Static software composition analysis, and D. Web application vulnerability report) may also provide useful information, a penetration test report specifically focuses on assessing the security of the application in a real-world scenario, which is highly relevant for an IS auditor's security review.
Nonsense....