Organizations understand there are aggregation risks associated with the way the process their customer's data. They typically include the details of this aggregation risk in a privacy notice and ask that all customers acknowledge they understand these risks and consent to the processing.
What type of risk response does this notice and consent represent?
When an organization includes the details of aggregation risks in a privacy notice and asks customers to acknowledge and consent to the processing of their data, it is essentially accepting the risk. By providing this information and obtaining consent, the organization is not transferring, mitigating, or avoiding the risk. Instead, it is acknowledging the risk and continuing with the data processing activities with the understanding and agreement of its customers, which corresponds to risk acceptance.
Still accepted this risk
logical
The question is looking at it from the organization's point of view. The user is accepting the risk, the organization is transferring the risk to the user.
why A Risk Transfer ???
B. Risk mitigation the NIST Privacy Control IP-1 on consent requires the system to provide individuals a mechanism to authorize the collection of their personal information, where feasible. This control may address a class of adverse privacy events, such as exclusion, which occurs when the individual does not have knowledge of, or participate in, the use of their personal information. If this use is made overt and the individual is permitted to authorize the use of their information for this purpose, then this risk to the individual is mitigated