Under the GDPR, who would be LEAST likely to be allowed to engage in the collection, use, and disclosure of a data subject’s sensitive medical information without the data subject’s knowledge or consent?
Under the GDPR, who would be LEAST likely to be allowed to engage in the collection, use, and disclosure of a data subject’s sensitive medical information without the data subject’s knowledge or consent?
Under the GDPR, sensitive medical information is highly protected, and its collection, use, and disclosure require explicit consent from the data subject unless specific exceptions apply. A member of the judiciary (option A) and a health professional (option C) may have lawful reasons to access such information without consent, particularly in legal disputes or life-threatening situations, respectively. A public authority responsible for public health (option B) may also access such data without consent if necessary for public safety. However, a journalist (option D) would not typically have a legitimate basis under GDPR to collect, use, and disclose sensitive medical information without the data subject’s knowledge or consent, even if they believe it is in the public interest. Therefore, option D is the least likely to be allowed to engage in such activities under GDPR.
D. A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in question, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.
AymanOthman 3 weeks, 6 days ago Selected Answer: D D. A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in question, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.
D. A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in question, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.
from the practice text.. D. A journalist writing an article relating to the medical condition in question, who believes that the publication of such information is in the public interest.