In which situation would a data controller most likely be able to justify the processing of the data of a child without parental consent?
In which situation would a data controller most likely be able to justify the processing of the data of a child without parental consent?
When providing preventive or counselling services to the child, parental consent is generally not required. This is because such services are considered essential for the child's well-being and are explicitly mentioned in regulations as an exception to parental consent requirements. Other situations mentioned, like market research, educational materials, or legitimate business interests, do not typically justify bypassing the need for parental consent.
The answer is B, recital 38 - The consent of the holder of parental responsibility should not be necessary in the context of preventive or counselling services offered directly to a child.
Its B. see Recital 38
Recital 38: 'Children merit specific protection with regard to their personal data, as they may be less aware of the risks, consequences and safeguards concerned and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data. Such specific protection should, in particular, apply to the use of personal data of children for the purposes of marketing or creating personality or user profiles and the collection of personal data with regard to children when using services offered directly to a child. The consent of the holder of parental responsibility should not be necessary in the context of preventive or counselling services offered directly to a child.'