Exam CIPM All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Question 33

SCENARIO -

Please use the following to answer the next question:

As the Director of data protection for Consolidated Records Corporation, you are justifiably pleased with your accomplishments so far. Your hiring was precipitated by warnings from regulatory agencies following a series of relatively minor data breaches that could easily have been worse. However, you have not had a reportable incident for the three years that you have been with the company. In fact, you consider your program a model that others in the data storage industry may note in their own program development.

You started the program at Consolidated from a jumbled mix of policies and procedures and worked toward coherence across departments and throughout operations. You were aided along the way by the program's sponsor, the vice president of operations, as well as by a Privacy Team that started from a clear understanding of the need for change.

Initially, your work was greeted with little confidence or enthusiasm by the company's "old guard" among both the executive team and frontline personnel working with data and interfacing with clients. Through the use of metrics that showed the costs not only of the breaches that had occurred, but also projections of the costs that easily could occur given the current state of operations, you soon had the leaders and key decision-makers largely on your side. Many of the other employees were more resistant, but face-to-face meetings with each department and the development of a baseline privacy training program achieved sufficient "buy-in" to begin putting the proper procedures into place.

Now, privacy protection is an accepted component of all current operations involving personal or protected data and must be part of the end product of any process of technological development. While your approach is not systematic, it is fairly effective.

You are left contemplating:

What must be done to maintain the program and develop it beyond just a data breach prevention program?

How can you build on your success?

What are the next action steps?

What practice would afford the Director the most rigorous way to check on the program's compliance with laws, regulations and industry best practices?

    Correct Answer: A

    Auditing provides a systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which criteria are fulfilled. In the context of data protection and compliance, an audit would offer the most rigorous method to ensure that the company's program meets the standards set by laws, regulations, and industry best practices.

Discussion
SsouravOption: A

Auditing provides a systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which criteria are fulfilled. In the context of data protection and compliance, an audit would offer the most rigorous method to ensure that the company's program meets the standards set by laws, regulations, and industry best practices.

DracoLOption: A

monitoring uses metrics to monitor but doesnt show if it comply. Audit is definitely the better answer

[Removed]Option: A

Should be A

emily0922Option: A

I suggest A

LutonOption: A

Should be A

RocketlyOption: A

Auditing is a more rigorous approach than monitoring

0d0ded9Option: A

Answer is A. Analyzing performance of the governance structure is essential to its success.

Gh789Option: C

C - Privacy Assessments measure organizations compliance with laws, regulations, adopted standards and internal policies and procedures.