Exam CIPM All QuestionsBrowse all questions from this exam
Go to Exam
Question 93

SCENARIO -

Please use the following to answer the next question:

You lead the privacy office for a company that handles information from individuals living in several countries throughout Europe and the Americas. You begin that morning’s privacy review when a contracts officer sends you a message asking for a phone call. The message lacks clarity and detail, but you presume that data was lost.

When you contact the contracts officer, he tells you that he received a letter in the mail from a vendor stating that the vendor improperly shared information about your customers. He called the vendor and confirmed that your company recently surveyed exactly 2000 individuals about their most recent healthcare experience and sent those surveys to the vendor to transcribe it into a database, but the vendor forgot to encrypt the database as promised in the contract. As a result, the vendor has lost control of the data.

The vendor is extremely apologetic and offers to take responsibility for sending out the notifications. They tell you they set aside 2000 stamped postcards because that should reduce the time it takes to get the notice in the mail. One side is limited to their logo, but the other side is blank and they will accept whatever you want to write. You put their offer on hold and begin to develop the text around the space constraints. You are content to let the vendor’s logo be associated with the notification.

The notification explains that your company recently hired a vendor to store information about their most recent experience at St. Sebastian Hospital’s Clinic for Infectious Diseases. The vendor did not encrypt the information and no longer has control of it. All 2000 affected individuals are invited to sign-up for email notifications about their information. They simply need to go to your company’s website and watch a quick advertisement, then provide their name, email address, and month and year of birth.

You email the incident-response council for their buy-in before 9 a.m. If anything goes wrong in this situation, you want to diffuse the blame across your colleagues. Over the next eight hours, everyone emails their comments back and forth. The consultant who leads the incident-response team notes that it is his first day with the company, but he has been in other industries for 45 years and will do his best. One of the three lawyers on the council causes the conversation to veer off course, but it eventually gets back on track. At the end of the day, they vote to proceed with the notification you wrote and use the vendor’s postcards.

Shortly after the vendor mails the postcards, you learn the data was on a server that was stolen, and make the decision to have your company offer credit monitoring services. A quick internet search finds a credit monitoring company with a convincing name: Credit Under Lock and Key (CRUDLOK). Your sales rep has never handled a contract for 2000 people, but develops a proposal in about a day which says CRUDLOK will:

Send an enrollment invitation to everyone the day after the contract is signed.

Enroll someone with just their first name and the last-4 of their national identifier.

Monitor each enrollee’s credit for two years from the date of enrollment.

Send a monthly email with their credit rating and offers for credit-related services at market rates.

Charge your company 20% of the cost of any credit restoration.

You execute the contract and the enrollment invitations are emailed to the 2000 individuals. Three days later you sit down and document all that went well and all that could have gone better. You put it in a file to reference the next time an incident occurs.

Which of the following elements of the incident did you adequately determine?

    Correct Answer: D

    The scenario clearly mentions that exactly 2000 individuals were surveyed and these are the ones whose information was compromised due to the vendor's failure to encrypt the data. This number was used in the notification process, demonstrating that the number of affected individuals was adequately determined. The other elements, while touched upon to some extent, were not determined with the same level of clarity and specificity as the exact number of affected individuals.

Discussion
SsouravOption: D

D. The number of individuals whose information was affected The scenario explicitly mentions that exactly 2000 individuals were affected by the vendor's oversight. The other elements, while touched upon to varying extents, were not as definitively determined as the exact number of individuals affected.

MaritzTeeOption: D

The scenario explicitly states that exactly 2000 individuals were surveyed, and it was confirmed that these surveys were the ones impacted by the vendor's failure to encrypt the data. This clear identification and quantification of the affected individuals were adequately determined and used in the notification process. The other elements, while important, were not addressed or resolved with the same clarity and certainty as the number of affected individuals.

thecheaterzOption: B

I think B because the information was related to an infectious disease questionnaire which could be classed as sensitive data and cause potential harm. The 2000 names is irrelevant and there could be more data on the server.

DPRamoneOption: B

The server was stolen. Who says the DB with the 2k individuals was the only resource affected ?

katizetiOption: D

Seems that D is correct.